Connect with us

Politics

USPTO wants to push AI deeper into its processes

Published

on


The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has already invested heavily in artificial intelligence capabilities. Its employees have access to several tools to review documents and reduce the burden on examiners for administrative and clerical tasks.

Through a new request for information, the USPTO wants to accelerate its use of AI tools.

In the RFI, USPTO says it’s looking for technology that could improve the efficiency in the patent and trademark examining processes. Some examples the agency highlighted in the RFI are those around IT improvements, robotic process automation (RPA) bot development/usage, and new code or ideas to improve current processes.

Greg Vidovich, the acting deputy commissioner for patents, said vendors should submit their feedback through the RFI to help the agency expand their current capabilities.

“Essentially [the RFI] amounts to a summary of the use of AI/machine learning for completion of a comprehensive search report with an analysis between the prior art found and the claims in the application. In the second bullet, this comes down to utilizing artificial intelligence to draft office actions to properly determine formality objections, for example, in the abstract specification claims or figures or rejections,” he said during USPTO’s industry day on June 17. “In the third bullet, again, utilizing artificial intelligence to create or complete office action based on input from the examiner. So anything that the examiner can provide, provide input, it would create or draft an office action.”

RFI asks 7 questions

One of the interesting things about the RFI is USPTO is looking for low cost or no cost services.

That was one of the seven questions USPTO asked for feedback on:

“Discuss your willingness to provide a solution(s) at low or no cost or in exchange for non-monetary considerations. If a low-cost solution or non-monetary benefit is of interest, describe how you/your organization defines low-cost and what non-monetary benefit might be of interest.”

Another question asked vendors to “describe any innovative tools or solutions, especially AI-based tools or solutions, you have developed that could assist in the comprehensive search and analysis of prior art.”

USPTO posted the RFI on SAM.gov on June 4. Vendors had until June 10 to submit questions and USPTO just extended the due date for responses to July 1.

Kristen Fuller, the director of the Office of Procurement at USPTO, said once the RFI closes, the agency will have the ability to reach out to respondents and set up one-on-one meetings to learn more about their capabilities or how they responded.

As for a possible solicitation, Fuller said she wasn’t ready to talk about USPTO’s plans for issuing one.

But given what USPTO has done so far and the potential it sees in AI capabilities, it’s clear the agency will want to continue to have access to these tools.

Jamie Holcombe, USPTO’s chief information officer, said the agency’s AI journey started four years ago.

“We first took inventory of our nine petabytes of detailed patent data, which anyone can download from our open data portal at data.uspto.gov to see for yourself what insights are hidden in this treasure trove of intellectual property data,” Holcombe said. “We crafted machine learning pilots, which led to production applications in the areas of classification and citation as well as prior art searching and fraud detection. The biggest lesson we learned was that all AI requires knowing your data, knowing data structure, data elements, data flow and, most importantly, data security. We realize that we are now in an era of intelligent computing where we succeed only by combining data, AI and infrastructure security for results and measurable outcomes. Intelligent computing needs curated data, creating a golden data set, the source where to start, because training with incorrect or non-aligned data often results in the application becoming what I label ‘learning disabled.’ Most others call it having hallucinations with inaccurate outcomes.”

Jamie Holcombe is the CIO for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Holcombe said he believes USPTO is just at the beginning of its journey to use AI, despite USPTO having several ongoing programs using AI.

Vidovich said one tool is an AI-assisted feature for examiners that helps them find similar documents more effectively while performing a search.

“It allows the examiner to find documents that are related to a document they may be reviewing as part of an existing search. This tool is part of our patents end-to-end (PE2E) search tool. It’s an internal search tool built on a web-based, modern platform that’s in the cloud,” he said. “With More Like This Document (MLTD) searches across U.S. patents, pre-grant publications and foreign patents, it’s over 120 million fully indexed documents that the examiners have access to that this tool runs against. It’s intended to supplement the examiners, allowing them to search to quickly find relevant prior art and improve patent quality.”

Existing AI capabilities

Since USPTO launched this tool in March 2024, Vidovich said examiners have used this almost 850,000 times in the office, and the adoption rate for 2025 is increasing.

A second tool called the Doc Code quality control is a newer automation tool to review every incoming document from applicant via patent center.

“What we’ve done internally is we’ve built an automation tool in house. It’s going to be designed to review every incoming document from the applicant via the Patent Center,” Vidovich said. “The tool will essentially review the applicant document, and it looks at the Doc Code that’s been applied by the applicant, and then it will suggest, if it’s not correct, an alternative to us internally to make that change. Why this is important? We get over 18 million documents filed in the office, and this automation tool is going to be designed to run across all those documents to make sure these document codes are correct so they translate through our systems properly. We just started full production … and the great thing about this is it’s going to reduce contract dependencies and provide cost savings to the agency.”

Along with the RFI and existing tools, USPTO has some AI tools in early test phases that it plans on expanding. Many of the tools are using generative AI.

Deborah Stephens, USPTO’s deputy CIO, said the agency gives early adopters access to the AI Lab, where teams can build tests, validate use cases and assess impacts to their business.

Stephens said one of USPTO’s test GenAI tools is called SCOUT: Searching, Consolidating, Outlining and Understanding Tool.

“We leverage SCOUT to assist in code development, detect improper filings, assist in cybersecurity threat detection and compliance, as well as monitoring and correlation,” she said. “Like many of you, we saw the global landscape of AI unfolding and its potential. In May 2023, a small federal team began using Frontier AI models in secure, appropriate guardrails, walled off. That was only available to this handful of highly technical internal users. Shortly thereafter in December 2024, we deployed a homegrown tool with mostly federal team members. It was a simply an easier way for team members to access those Frontier AI models and expand our user base and develop some additional use cases. Then fast forward to March 2025, we got our Alpha version with 40-plus users trying very specific use cases. And now in June 2025, we’re very pleased to have over 200 Alpha users, and later this summer, we will release a beta version for a larger user base.”

Stephens added USPTO believes SCOUT has proven its capabilities are valuable and making a difference for employees, which is why expansion is on the near term horizon.

The post USPTO wants to push AI deeper into its processes first appeared on Federal News Network.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

President Trump Taps Dr. Ben Carson for New Role — A HUGE Win for America First Agenda

Published

on

By

Dr. Ben Carson is the newest member of the Trump administration.

On Wednesday, former Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Ben Carson, was sworn in as the national adviser for nutrition, health, and housing at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins shared that Carson’s role will be to oversee Trump’s new Big Beautiful Bill law, which aims to ensure Americans’ quality of life, from nutrition to stable housing.

After being sworn in, Carson shared, “Today, too many Americans are suffering from the effects of poor nutrition. Through common-sense policymaking, we have an opportunity to give our most vulnerable families the tools they need to flourish.”

Table of Contents

WATCH:

Per USDA:

Today, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins announced that Dr. Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., M.D., was sworn in as the National Advisor for Nutrition, Health, and Housing at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

“There is no one more qualified than Dr. Carson to advise on policies that improve Americans’ everyday quality of life, from nutrition to healthcare quality to ensuring families have access to safe and stable housing,” said Secretary Rollins.

“With six in ten Americans living with at least one chronic disease, and rural communities facing unique challenges with respect to adequate housing, Dr. Carson’s insight and experience is critical. Dr. Carson will be crucial to implementing the rural health investment provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill and advise on America First polices related to nutrition, health, and housing.

“As the U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development in the first Trump Administration, Dr. Carson worked to expand opportunity and strengthen communities, and we are honored to welcome him to the second Trump Administration to help lead our efforts here at USDA to Make America Healthy Again and ensure rural America continues to prosper.”

“Today, too many Americans are suffering from the effects of poor nutrition. Through common-sense policymaking, we have an opportunity to give our most vulnerable families the tools they need to flourish,” said Dr. Ben Carson. “I am honored to work with Secretary Rollins on these important initiatives to help fulfill President Trump’s vision for a healthier, stronger America.”

On Sunday, Dr. Carson was one of the many speakers at the memorial service of the late TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk.

During the memorial service, Carson highlighted that Kirk was shot at 12:24 p.m. and then continued to share the Bible verse John 12:24, which reads, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.”

WATCH:

The post President Trump Taps Dr. Ben Carson for New Role — A HUGE Win for America First Agenda appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Politics

LEAKED MEMO: Deep State Prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia Claim There Isn’t Enough Evidence to Convict Comey Amid Reports of Imminent Indictment

Published

on

By

On Wednesday evening, disgruntled officials in the Eastern District of Virginia leaked contents of a memo explaining why charges should not be brought against James Comey.

As reported earlier, former FBI Director James Comey is expected to be indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia in the next few days.

Comey will reportedly be charged for lying to Congress in a 2020 testimony about whether he authorized leaks to the media.

Officials in the Eastern District of Virginia are still fighting to stop Comey from being charged after Trump fired US Attorney Erik Siebert.

President Trump last week fired Erik Siebert as the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia because he refused to bring charges against Letitia James, Comey, Schiff and others.

On Saturday evening, President Trump announced that he had appointed Lindsey Halligan – his personal attorney who defended him against the Mar-a-Lago raid – as US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Now, with just days to go before the statute of limitations runs out to charge Comey for lying during a September 30, 2020 testimony, Lindsey Halligan is reportedly gearing up to indict Comey.

Prosecutors reportedly gave newly sworn-in Halligan a memo defending James Comey and explaining why charges should not brought against the fired FBI Director.

Per MSNBC’s Ken Dilanian:

Two sources familiar with the matter tell me prosecutors in the EDVA US attorney‘s office presented newly sworn US attorney Lindsey Halligan with a memo explaining why charges should not be brought against James Comey, because there isn’t enough evidence to establish probable cause a crime was committed, let alone enough to convince a jury to convict him.

Justice Department guidelines say a case should not be brought unless prosecutors believe it’s more likely than not that they can win a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.

The post LEAKED MEMO: Deep State Prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia Claim There Isn’t Enough Evidence to Convict Comey Amid Reports of Imminent Indictment appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nearly 8 in 10 Voters Say the United States is in Political Crisis After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Published

on

By

Nearly eight in ten voters believe that the United States is in a political crisis in the wake of the assassination of conservative icon Charlie Kirk.

According to a Quinnipiac University national poll of registered voters released on Wednesday, a massive 93 percent of Democrats, 84 percent of independents, and 60 percent of Republicans said the nation is in a political crisis.

“The Kirk assassination lays bare raw, bipartisan concerns about where the country is headed,” Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy said of the poll results.

Quinnipiac reports:

Seventy-one percent of voters think politically motivated violence in the United States today is a very serious problem, 22 percent think it is a somewhat serious problem, 3 percent think it is a not so serious problem, and 1 percent think it is not a problem at all.

This is a jump from Quinnipiac University’s June 26 poll when 54 percent thought politically motivated violence in the United States today was a very serious problem, 37 percent thought it was a somewhat serious problem, 6 percent thought it was a not so serious problem, and 2 percent thought it was not a problem at all.

Nearly 6 in 10 voters (58 percent) think it will not be possible to lower the temperature on political rhetoric and speech in the United States, while 34 percent think it will be possible.

Over half, 54 percent, of voters believe the US will see increased political violence over the next few years. Another 27 percent said they think it will stay “about the same,” while just 14 percent believe it will ease.

A 53 percent majority also said they are “pessimistic about freedom of speech being protected in the United States.”

Surprisingly, a 53 percent majority also believes the current system of democracy is not working.

“From a perceived assault on freedom of speech to the fragility of the democracy, a shudder of concern and pessimism rattles a broad swath of the electorate. Nearly 80 percent of registered voters feel they are witnessing a political crisis, seven in ten say political violence is a very serious problem, and a majority say this discord won’t go away anytime soon,” Malloy added.

The vast majority, 82 percent, said the way that people discuss politics is contributing to the violence.

“When asked if political discourse is contributing to violence, a rare meeting of the minds…Republicans, Democrats, and independents in equal numbers say yes, it is,” Malloy said.

The survey was conducted from September 18 to 21 among 1,276 registered voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.3 percentage points.

The post Nearly 8 in 10 Voters Say the United States is in Political Crisis After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Trending