Connect with us

Politics

‘Absolutely nuts’: DHS secretary to review all contract, grant awards over $100k

Published

3 months ago

on

Just ahead of the busiest time of the year for most agency acquisition shops, the Homeland Security Department is throwing in an extra layer of review for its procurement efforts.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem is requiring her office to review and sign off on all contracts and awards over $100,000.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem issued a new contract award review policy.
(AP Photo/Etienne Laurent)

“All proposals for my consideration must include all relevant details, including any mission impact, dollar values, description of the supplies or services, any timeliness issues and a description of the proposed action,” Noem wrote in the memo obtained by Federal News Network. “Requests for approval of obligations above the $100,000 threshold must be submitted via memo through the Executive Secretary process. As with any request for secretarial approval, please allow a minimum of five days for front office review.”

Based on the last three fiscal years’ data, Noem’s office will have to approve more than 5,100 contract actions worth over 100,000.

“I think most, if not all sane and knowledgeable people would consider this policy absolutely nuts,” said Mark Borkowski, who served for 13 years as the assistant commissioner and chief acquisition officer at the Customs and Border Protection directorate before retiring in 2023. “I understand why someone would want to do this. I completely understand the rationale as we did something similar at CBP when I was there. This is as much an opportunity to audit contracts and figure out what is there and look for waste and redundancy. So I understand their motivation, but this will be  tremendous workload.”

Data from Deltek, a market research firm, found DHS spends between 45% and 47% of its procurement budget in the fourth quarter, which starts July 1.

Federal News Network asked DHS for more details about the decision, including how the Noem plans to ensure the approval process for contract and grant awards doesn’t create a backlog at a critical time of the year.

A DHS spokesperson said: “Under Secretary Noem’s leadership, DHS is rooting out waste, fraud [and] abuse, and is reprioritizing appropriated dollars. Secretary Noem is delivering accountability to the U.S. taxpayer, which Washington bureaucrats have ignored for decades at the expense of American citizens.”

Noem said in her memo that this new guidance supersedes a previous directive calling for her approval for all spending over $25 million.

DHS policy is “bush league”

Borkowski said the memo opens the door to a lot of questions about the reviews needed when an office picks up an option under an existing contract or for task orders under indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) type contracts. He said CBP used a time-and-materials contracts to address contingency or emergency needs and questioned whether those, too, would need Secretary approval.

“There has to be some other agenda here. Is the intent to slow down and gum up the works or to stop things? There is no way the secretary will be able to review these contracts,” Borkowski said. “Who will be doing these reviews? The politicals? But they will also need experts in procurement and acquisition from across the agency so that means folks will be pulled away from supporting the mission at one of the busiest times of the year. I know procurement people are often stressed at end of fiscal year so I’d also be concerned what this will do to workload on folks who now have to be diverted to support this process.”

Another former DHS acquisition executive, who requested anonymity for fear of reprisals, called this memo “ridiculous” and “bush league.”

“The procurement system is purposely separated from political influence. By doing this she’s violating that principle,” the former executive said. “Is the secretary in the position to make technical and cost trade-off analysis? Does her staff have cost analysts to determine if the price is ‘right’ based on the requirement? Is she merely looking to see if the award is going to a company favorable to the administration? The mission need and estimated costs are always decided BEFORE the procurement.”

Both Borkowski and the other former executive said the five-day review period and the $100,000 floor threshold also are concerning.

Not only is $100,000 well below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold of $350,000, but many times these small buys are done using purchase cards, which means there is an immediate need for the product or service.

“Smart buying would suggest that low-dollar value items are purchased at economical quantities for the sake of efficiency and to save money. The fact that secretary would want to consider little thing like bulk printer paper buys, restocking rubber gloves at TSA check points or anything of this nature sounds like waste, fraud and abuse to me,” said the former executive. “The secretary and her staff should have far more important things to do with her time.”

5-day reviews critical

Borkowski said contracting officers can easily build in the five-day review requirement into their timeline so as not to impact the acquisition. But he’s skeptical that the secretary’s office can be relied upon to meet their own deadlines.

“If you can’t rely on the five day review, and I don’t believe you can, then I think you will have some serious issues getting contract actions through. Hopefully they find some way to come up with a waiver for contingencies and other urgent needs,” he said.

During his last few years at CBP, Borkowski said he initiated a similar review of service contracts after receiving criticism from oversight bodies like the Government Accountability Office.

“I was tasked to create a review process for service contracts and we met monthly. The first thing we did was collect list of contracts and there were thousands of them. We had to set threshold for what to review and we also looked those deemed high interest. We set a threshold of $2 million. If we went below that, there wasn’t enough hours in the day and would’ve shut the organization down waiting to review them. That was just CBP and just a subset of contracts,” he said. “I ran that and had others to help, and it was a lot of work. And I was just a component acquisition executive. This new effort is going to be an incredible amount of work, particularly if you go down to sec level.”

The post ‘Absolutely nuts’: DHS secretary to review all contract, grant awards over $100k first appeared on Federal News Network.

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

President Trump Taps Dr. Ben Carson for New Role — A HUGE Win for America First Agenda

Published

3 hours ago

on

September 25, 2025

By

Dr. Ben Carson is the newest member of the Trump administration.

On Wednesday, former Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Ben Carson, was sworn in as the national adviser for nutrition, health, and housing at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins shared that Carson’s role will be to oversee Trump’s new Big Beautiful Bill law, which aims to ensure Americans’ quality of life, from nutrition to stable housing.

After being sworn in, Carson shared, “Today, too many Americans are suffering from the effects of poor nutrition. Through common-sense policymaking, we have an opportunity to give our most vulnerable families the tools they need to flourish.”

Table of Contents

WATCH:

Per USDA:

Today, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins announced that Dr. Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., M.D., was sworn in as the National Advisor for Nutrition, Health, and Housing at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

“There is no one more qualified than Dr. Carson to advise on policies that improve Americans’ everyday quality of life, from nutrition to healthcare quality to ensuring families have access to safe and stable housing,” said Secretary Rollins.

“With six in ten Americans living with at least one chronic disease, and rural communities facing unique challenges with respect to adequate housing, Dr. Carson’s insight and experience is critical. Dr. Carson will be crucial to implementing the rural health investment provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill and advise on America First polices related to nutrition, health, and housing.

“As the U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development in the first Trump Administration, Dr. Carson worked to expand opportunity and strengthen communities, and we are honored to welcome him to the second Trump Administration to help lead our efforts here at USDA to Make America Healthy Again and ensure rural America continues to prosper.”

“Today, too many Americans are suffering from the effects of poor nutrition. Through common-sense policymaking, we have an opportunity to give our most vulnerable families the tools they need to flourish,” said Dr. Ben Carson. “I am honored to work with Secretary Rollins on these important initiatives to help fulfill President Trump’s vision for a healthier, stronger America.”

On Sunday, Dr. Carson was one of the many speakers at the memorial service of the late TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk.

During the memorial service, Carson highlighted that Kirk was shot at 12:24 p.m. and then continued to share the Bible verse John 12:24, which reads, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.”

WATCH:

The post President Trump Taps Dr. Ben Carson for New Role — A HUGE Win for America First Agenda appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Politics

LEAKED MEMO: Deep State Prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia Claim There Isn’t Enough Evidence to Convict Comey Amid Reports of Imminent Indictment

Published

3 hours ago

on

September 25, 2025

By

On Wednesday evening, disgruntled officials in the Eastern District of Virginia leaked contents of a memo explaining why charges should not be brought against James Comey.

As reported earlier, former FBI Director James Comey is expected to be indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia in the next few days.

Comey will reportedly be charged for lying to Congress in a 2020 testimony about whether he authorized leaks to the media.

Officials in the Eastern District of Virginia are still fighting to stop Comey from being charged after Trump fired US Attorney Erik Siebert.

President Trump last week fired Erik Siebert as the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia because he refused to bring charges against Letitia James, Comey, Schiff and others.

On Saturday evening, President Trump announced that he had appointed Lindsey Halligan – his personal attorney who defended him against the Mar-a-Lago raid – as US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Now, with just days to go before the statute of limitations runs out to charge Comey for lying during a September 30, 2020 testimony, Lindsey Halligan is reportedly gearing up to indict Comey.

Prosecutors reportedly gave newly sworn-in Halligan a memo defending James Comey and explaining why charges should not brought against the fired FBI Director.

Per MSNBC’s Ken Dilanian:

Two sources familiar with the matter tell me prosecutors in the EDVA US attorney‘s office presented newly sworn US attorney Lindsey Halligan with a memo explaining why charges should not be brought against James Comey, because there isn’t enough evidence to establish probable cause a crime was committed, let alone enough to convince a jury to convict him.

Justice Department guidelines say a case should not be brought unless prosecutors believe it’s more likely than not that they can win a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.

The post LEAKED MEMO: Deep State Prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia Claim There Isn’t Enough Evidence to Convict Comey Amid Reports of Imminent Indictment appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nearly 8 in 10 Voters Say the United States is in Political Crisis After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Published

4 hours ago

on

September 25, 2025

By

Nearly eight in ten voters believe that the United States is in a political crisis in the wake of the assassination of conservative icon Charlie Kirk.

According to a Quinnipiac University national poll of registered voters released on Wednesday, a massive 93 percent of Democrats, 84 percent of independents, and 60 percent of Republicans said the nation is in a political crisis.

“The Kirk assassination lays bare raw, bipartisan concerns about where the country is headed,” Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy said of the poll results.

Quinnipiac reports:

Seventy-one percent of voters think politically motivated violence in the United States today is a very serious problem, 22 percent think it is a somewhat serious problem, 3 percent think it is a not so serious problem, and 1 percent think it is not a problem at all.

This is a jump from Quinnipiac University’s June 26 poll when 54 percent thought politically motivated violence in the United States today was a very serious problem, 37 percent thought it was a somewhat serious problem, 6 percent thought it was a not so serious problem, and 2 percent thought it was not a problem at all.

Nearly 6 in 10 voters (58 percent) think it will not be possible to lower the temperature on political rhetoric and speech in the United States, while 34 percent think it will be possible.

Over half, 54 percent, of voters believe the US will see increased political violence over the next few years. Another 27 percent said they think it will stay “about the same,” while just 14 percent believe it will ease.

A 53 percent majority also said they are “pessimistic about freedom of speech being protected in the United States.”

Surprisingly, a 53 percent majority also believes the current system of democracy is not working.

“From a perceived assault on freedom of speech to the fragility of the democracy, a shudder of concern and pessimism rattles a broad swath of the electorate. Nearly 80 percent of registered voters feel they are witnessing a political crisis, seven in ten say political violence is a very serious problem, and a majority say this discord won’t go away anytime soon,” Malloy added.

The vast majority, 82 percent, said the way that people discuss politics is contributing to the violence.

“When asked if political discourse is contributing to violence, a rare meeting of the minds…Republicans, Democrats, and independents in equal numbers say yes, it is,” Malloy said.

The survey was conducted from September 18 to 21 among 1,276 registered voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.3 percentage points.

The post Nearly 8 in 10 Voters Say the United States is in Political Crisis After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Trending