Connect with us

Entertainment

Jane’s Addiction Legal Battle Escalates as Perry Farrell Files Lawsuit Saying He’s the Assault Victim

Published

on

The same day that members of Jane’s Addiction sued their frontman Perry Farrell for allegedly attacking guitarist Dave Navarro onstage last year, the singer hit back with his own lawsuit, claiming he was actually the victim in the viral scuffle after years of “bullying” by his bandmates.

The legal battle began the morning of Wednesday (July 16), when Farrell was sued for allegedly punching Navarro mid-set at Boston’s Leader Bank Pavilion in September. The guitarist, alongside Jane’s Addiction bassist Eric Avery and drummer Stephen Perkins, claimed this assault cost them millions by forcing the cancellation of the rest of their reunion tour and derailing plans for a new album.

Jane's Addiction Members Sue Perry Farrell for 'Brutal' Onstage Assault: ‘Unprovoked Anger…

07/16/2025

Farrell is now returning fire with his own lawsuit against Navarro, Perkins and Avery. In a complaint filed in Los Angeles court, Farrell says his bandmates actually assaulted him onstage in Boston after he complained about Navarro playing too loudly during the song “Ocean Size.”

“Farrell reacted by body-checking Navarro,” the complaint reads. “Farrell did not throw any punches, but simply wanted to alert Navarro that he had to stop playing so loud. The video evidence is clear that the first altercation onstage during the Boston show was hardly one-sided, and in fact, what followed was an inappropriate violent escalation by Navarro and Avery that was disproportionate to Farrell’s minor body check of Navarro.”

According to the Farrell lawsuit, Navarro “aggressively” put his arm into Farrell’s neck, followed by Avery putting Farrell in a headlock and “punching him repeatedly in the kidneys and stomach” while still onstage. The fight then continued backstage, where Farrell says Navarro “menacingly charged” at both him and his wife.

Farrell says that the alleged assault was the culmination of a “years-long bullying campaign” in which his bandmates have tried to “undermine” him onstage by playing so loudly that he can’t hear himself or sing in tune. This has forced Farrell to turn up his in-ear monitors to hear himself, the lawsuit says, causing him significant eardrum damage and advanced hearing loss.

According to the lawsuit, Farrell wanted to keep touring after this incident and fulfill the band’s contractual obligations. But he says Navarro, Perkins and Avery unliterally canceled the rest of the tour and made him the “scapegoat” by falsely blaming the decision on Farrell’s nonexistent “mental health difficulties.”

“Plaintiffs are informed, believe and on these bases allege that defendants made their false and defamatory statements regarding Perry Farrell’s mental health in a spurious effort both to change the narrative about the events of the band’s last show, but also as a part of a disingenuous effort to secure insurance coverage for their own irresponsible cancellation of the tour,” the lawsuit says.

Farrell is suing his bandmates for assault, battery, infliction of emotional distress and breach of contract. He’s seeking unspecified monetary damages for the financial fallout from the tour’s cancellation, as well as for physical and emotional harm.

The singer’s attorney, Miles Cooley, said in a statement on Wednesday that the September incident was “devastating” for Farrell.

“Despite this continued bullying perpetuated by Navarro, Perry’s dedication to Jane’s Addiction and the preservation of its positive impact on the music industry remains unshaken,” said Cooley. “He is actively exploring ways to address the situation and ensure accountability.”

Christopher Frost, an attorney representing Navarro, Perkins and Avery, called Farrell’s lawsuit “revisionist history” in a statement.

“If there is a question about what to believe, you can believe the video we’ve all watched,” said Frost. “You can believe Etty Farrell’s contemporaneous Instagram posts stating: ‘Perry was clearly the aggressor, I’m not arguing that point at all… [H]e has been struggling mentally for quite some time….’ You can believe Perry himself when he apologized to the band: ‘I apologize to my bandmates, especially Dave Navarro, fans, family and friends for my actions during Friday’s show. Unfortunately, my breaking point resulted in inexcusable behavior.'”

This story was updated on July 16 at 8:23 p.m. ET with a statement from Frost.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Spotify’s Stock Tumbled After Its Mixed Q2 Earnings — But Analysts See the Bigger Picture

Published

on

By

Some earnings results are more difficult to interpret than others, and Spotify’s were no exception. Like Universal Music Group’s Q2 earnings, which contained a jumble of metrics headed in opposite directions, the streaming giant’s results were a mixed bag of wins and losses — a contrast to previous quarters when the metrics were in much better alignment.

The market seemed to take the Spotify results poorly, as the company’s share price dropped more than 11% following Tuesday’s earnings release. (Importantly, a pullback of that scope isn’t a surprise given Spotify’s share price was up 112% over the last year through Monday, July 28.) Analysts, however, were more sanguine and focused on the company’s long-term prospects rather than the quarter-to-quarter bumpiness.

Spotify Beats Expectations for Quarterly Revenue as Paid Subscribers Climb to 276 Million

Dave Grohl of Foo Fighters performs at Roskilde Festival 2024 on July 05, 2024 in Roskilde, Denmark

Foo Fighters Bring on Nine Inch Nails Drummer IIan Rubin Ahead of Asia Tour

Post Malone performs onstage at the 2025 Coachella Valley Music And Arts Festival on April 20, 2025 in Indio, California.

Post Malone's Ex Drops California Custody Case Over 3-Year-Old Daughter

Some of the factors that influenced Spotify’s mixed quarter were under its control (subscriber growth, lower-than-expected advertising performance). But some factors were out of its control (foreign exchange losses) while others were a combination of external and internal forces (higher stock-based compensation expense related to Spotify’s soaring share price). That’s a lot to digest.

Spotify’s earnings results highlighted the tension between investors’ desire for neat, linear growth and the untidy realities for companies that report earnings every three months. For a variety of reasons, some quarters will be better than others, and CEO Daniel Ek encouraged investors “to be prepared” for those instances where Spotify spends more money to grow the business over the long term.

A drop in advertising prices, for example, might spur Spotify to “double or triple” its marketing expense, Ek explained. “We generally expect to see more efficiencies as we’re leveraging better and better tools,” he said, “but sometimes that efficiency may mean that the right thing is to actually spend more in the short term to then get it back in the long term.” Translation: The path to success isn’t a straight line.

Equity analysts, who love a clean narrative as much as anybody, tried to make sense of the contrasting indicators. J.P. Morgan analysts called it a “messy” quarter for its mix of positives and negatives. Some analysts slightly lowered their forecasts for revenue and operating income. Everybody pointed to the fact that Spotify will encounter some bumps in the road as it makes investments (which are a drag on earnings) in pursuit of long-term growth (which, to Ek’s point, could help earnings down the road).

Related

Spotify Logo

Spotify’s Q2 Earnings Results: What You Should Know

But there was nothing in Spotify’s results and executives’ comments that changed analysts’ overall theses. Investors want to see year-over-year growth every quarter, but analysts know that isn’t realistic. In their notes to investors, analysts focused on long-term opportunities to attract subscribers, benefits from current investments and Spotify’s ability to generate additional revenue.

Analysts believe that Spotify will continue to succeed if it makes the platform more engaging. Some of them homed in on two statistics that Spotify mentioned during the earnings call: 350 million users have streamed a video podcast, and video consumption is growing 20 times faster than audio-only consumption. Spotify’s investments in AI could also lead to better engagement. Spotify now has AI playlists in 40 countries, and user engagement with its AI DJ has “nearly doubled” in the last year, Gustav Söderström said during Tuesday’s earnings call.

Another factor in long-term growth is Spotify’s ability to generate revenue in different ways. For most of its history, Spotify has made money selling ads and subscriptions based on music listening. That has changed in recent years, and J.P. Morgan analysts believe the company has the ability to improve monetization outside of the record label/music publisher royalty structure. In other words, podcasts and audiobooks have the potential to help drive revenue without giving 70% of that revenue to music rights holders.

In the end, analysts’ valuation models didn’t change much, if at all. Guggenheim lowered its price target to $800 from $840 and maintained its buy rating. J.P. Morgan maintained its $740 price target. Cantor Fitzgerald left its $640 price target unchanged and reiterated its neutral rating. Bernstein kept its $840 price target and outperform rating. There’s a $200 variance in price targets within those four examples. But considering Spotify closed Friday at $627.15, it’s clear all the analysts feel there is upside for investors willing to hold on through occasional rough terrain.  

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Led Zeppelin’s Jimmy Page Settles Lawsuit Over Decades-Old ‘Dazed and Confused’ Credits Dispute

Published

on

By

Led Zeppelin‘s Jimmy Page and a songwriter have reached a settlement to resolve the latest lawsuit over the disputed credits to the band’s iconic song “Dazed and Confused,” according to new court filings.

The agreement, filed in court Friday (Aug. 1), will quickly end a copyright case filed this spring by Jake Holmes, a songwriter who has claimed for years that he actually wrote “Dazed and Confused” and that Page simply performed it without credit or payment.

Led Zeppelin’s Jimmy Page Hit With New Lawsuit Over Decades-Old ‘Dazed and Confused’ Dispute

Dave Grohl of Foo Fighters performs at Roskilde Festival 2024 on July 05, 2024 in Roskilde, Denmark

Foo Fighters Bring on Nine Inch Nails Drummer IIan Rubin Ahead of Asia Tour

Post Malone performs onstage at the 2025 Coachella Valley Music And Arts Festival on April 20, 2025 in Indio, California.

Post Malone's Ex Drops California Custody Case Over 3-Year-Old Daughter

Terms of the deal were not disclosed in public filings, other than to say that it “resolves the entire case” and will be formalized in the weeks ahead. Notice of the settlement was filed by attorneys for Holmes and was not signed by lawyers for Page or other defendants.

Reps for Page did not return a request for comment. An attorney for Holmes declined to comment.

Holmes wrote and recorded “Dazed and Confused” in 1967; Page later reworked it into a song for his band The Yardbirds, then into the famed 1969 Zeppelin track. Decades later, in 2010, Holmes filed a copyright lawsuit against Page. That case quickly settled, and the credits for Zeppelin’s track now say it was “written Jimmy Page, inspired by Jake Holmes.”

But in May, Holmes sued Page again, accusing the legendary rocker of flouting that earlier agreement and violating his rights. The case centered on newly released recordings of Yardbirds performances and the recent documentary Becoming Led Zeppelin.

“By falsely claiming that the Holmes composition is the Page composition, … Page [and others] have willfully infringed the Holmes composition,” Holmes’ lawyers write. “Defendants…have ignored plaintiff’s cease and desist demand and continue to infringe.”

The case against Page was still in the earliest stages, and he and the various other defendants (which also included music publisher Warner Chappell and film studio Sony Pictures) had not yet formally responded to the accusations with court filings of their own.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Justin Timberlake’s *NSYNC Bandmate Shows Support After Lyme Disease Reveal: ‘That’s Superhero Status’

Published

on

By

Chris Kirkpatrick says his *NSYNC bandmate Justin Timberlake “showed me a whole new level of strength” in the wake of Timberlake’s announcement that he has Lyme disease on Thursday (July 31).

Kirkpatrick took to Instagram to show support for Timberlake, who struggled with Lyme disease on his recent Forget Tomorrow World Tour, which closed out last night.

Justin Timberlake Reveals Lyme Disease Diagnosis: ‘Living With This Can Be Relentlessly Debilitating’

Chappell Roan attends the 2024 MTV Video Music Awards at UBS Arena on September 11, 2024 in Elmont, New York.

Chappell Roan Arrives at Her Next Stop With 'The Subway': Stream It Now

Ghostface Killah

Listen to Ghostface Killah Channel Eric B & Rakim in New Single 'Rap Kingpin'

“Watching him battle Lyme disease day in and day out, while still getting on that stage night after night, was something I’ll never forget,” Kirkpatrick wrote under a photo of himself, Timberlake and fellow *NSYNC members Lance Bass and JC Chasez. “The long days, the travel, the exhaustion — and yet, he never gave up. No complaints, no excuses — just heart, grit, and pure determination.”

Kirkpatrick added about Timberlake, “That kind of resilience is rare.”

In a vulnerable Instagram post Thursday (July 31), Timberlake shared photos from his time on the road and wrote, “As I’m reflecting on the tour and festival tour — I want to tell you a little bit about what’s going on with me.” 

Timberlake went on to announce, “Among other things, I’ve been battling some health issues, and was diagnosed with Lyme disease — which I don’t say so you feel bad for me — but to shed some light on what I’ve been up against behind the scenes.”

“If you’ve experienced this disease or know someone who has — then you’re aware: living with this can be relentlessly debilitating, both mentally and physically,” he continued. “When I first got the diagnosis I was shocked for sure. But, at least I could understand why I would be onstage and in a massive amount of nerve pain or, just feeling crazy fatigue or sickness. I was faced with a personal decision. Stop touring? Or, keep going and figure it out. I decided the joy that performing brings me far outweighs the fleeting stress my body was feeling. I’m so glad I kept going.”

Continuing his support, Kirkpatrick wrote: “I couldn’t be more proud to call him my friend. Tour life is already a grind, but doing it while fighting Lyme disease? That’s superhero status.”

Kirkpatrick concluded his post with, “Here’s to strength, perseverance, and one hell of a tour. Love you little bro.”

Timberlake isn’t the first musician who’s publicly shared his Lyme diagnosis, with Shania Twain, Avril Lavigne, Justin Bieber and more stars also previously speaking about their struggles with the illness.

Continue Reading

Trending