Connect with us

Politics

‘This isn’t how a RIF is supposed to work:’ HHS reinstates some laid-off employees, gives them extra work

Published

on

The Department of Health and Human Services is gradually reinstating some of the staff laid off last month, but the partial reinstatements are still causing uncertainty among HHS employees.

About 10,000 HHS employees were removed in a reduction in force (RIF) on April 1. Another 10,000 employees voluntarily left the agency through the deferred resignation program, early retirement offers or incentive payments worth up to $25,000. The workforce reductions across HHS totaled about 25%, but some of the initial layoffs are now being walked back.

At the National Institutes of Health, a human resources employee said she is among 150 HR staff members being reinstated to process the paperwork of the many employees separating from the agency. NIH fired about 1,200 of its employees on April 1. The NIH HR employee received her reinstatement email on May 20.

“You previously received a notice regarding the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) upcoming reduction in force (RIF),” an NIH email, obtained by Federal News Network, states. “That notice is hereby revoked. You will not be affected by the upcoming RIF.”

At the same time, a court-ordered preliminary injunction issued Thursday may change the status of many more federal employees who have been impacted by agency RIFs. A U.S. District Court judge in San Francisco has once again found that the Trump administration violated separation of powers principles with its restructuring orders.

The injunction requires agencies to reverse any RIF notices they have already begun or conducted under an executive order from President Donald Trump. But the court order still allows agencies to pause “retrospective” steps while the case is being appealed.

But at HHS, prior to the court order, another 60 recently fired acquisition employees working in the office of the HHS chief information officer (OCIO) were already reinstated and told to return to work “immediately.”

One reinstated OCIO employee said the May 21 email, titled “Rescission of Previous Notice of Reduction in Force,” went to her junk mail folder. After reading it, the employee called her supervisor to verify its authenticity.

“I reached out to my supervisor. I immediately got out my phone. I was like, ‘Is this real?’ She said, ‘Yes, it is, they called back our group,’” the employee told Federal News Network.

In a virtual meeting with the new OCIO leadership team, reinstated employees were told they can temporarily work from home if they need to make child care arrangements or deal with other personal matters before coming back to the office.

“People have had to put off medical procedures. People have taken their children out of child care because they were trying to just save their money, because they didn’t know if they were going to find a job soon,” the OCIO employee said.

Reinstated HHS employees are expected to take on some of the duties of employees who aren’t being brought back.

“They were saying we were being brought back because of the good work we do,” the OCIO employee said. “None of our project managers are coming back, and they expect us to now serve in a project management role. Most of us are not subject matter experts.”

The OCIO employee, who has worked for the federal government for nearly 20 years, said her acquisition team purchases IT equipment for HHS and manages software licenses — some of which are critical to issuing HHS grant funds.

“It’s not simple when you can’t open your Adobe or Salesforce, or any of the systems we use just to turn our computers on every day,” the employee said. “You disable the entire system when you don’t have these licenses or software in place. And it’s not an easy feat to do it. These things take time, they take a lot of negotiating, they take the expertise of our IT professionals, our subject matter experts, who definitely should be called back but are not being called back.”

Many HHS employees found out they were laid off last month when their Personal Identity Verification (PIV) cards were deactivated and no longer enabled them to enter their offices. The OCIO employee said many of her coworkers left their laptops at the office after getting their RIF notices. It’s not entirely clear how many reinstated HHS employees have working PIV cards or laptops that would allow them to get back to work.

“If your card works, you can work from home. If you can make it into the office and your card is active, you are expected to work immediately. They didn’t give us a day. They just said effective immediately,” the employee said.

The OCIO employee said she’s not convinced that HHS will keep reinstated employees around for the long term, and said her firing and reinstatement feels like a “mind game that they’re playing with us.”

“I have no issue with a reduction in force. I’ve seen it done before, and I have no problem with that, but if you do it the right way, it takes months, sometimes a year, to do a study. The risk plans are very transparent. People know where they’re going. There are workshops with HR, there are resume-writing workshops. There are so many things in place when they’re going to RIF someone, and they did none of that,” the employee said.

At NIOSH, ‘the future is in question’ with only a third of its employees

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) was another target in the mass layoffs at HHS in early April. The HHS component, which focuses on workplace safety and health standards, lost about 90% of its approximately 1,200-employee workforce in the RIF last month.

But after significant pressure from unions and lawmakers, HHS partially reversed course last week and reinstated 328 of the employees it had previously fired. The reinstatements brought back NIOSH employees working in coal mining research programs in Ohio and West Virginia, as well as employees working in the agency’s World Trade Center Health Program, which supports 9/11 first responders.

During a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on Tuesday, Chairwoman Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) said she was “pleased” with the agency’s partial reversal of the RIF at NIOSH, but that more should be done to bring back employees.

“While your action last week was a good step, there are still other divisions within NIOSH with specialized staff who conduct essential, unique work,” Capito told HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during the hearing. “I support the President’s vision to right-size our government, but … I don’t think eliminating NIOSH programs will accomplish that goal.”

NIOSH employees, represented by the American Federation of Government Employees, traveled to Washington, D.C., from across the country to meet with lawmakers this week and hold a rally outside HHS headquarters, urging the remainder of their colleagues to be brought back on the job.

Catherine Blackwood, a postdoctoral fellow who has been working at NIOSH as an immunotoxicology at NIOSH’s Morgantown, West Virginia, campus since 2021, said public-facing programs have been “brought back to a certain level,” but are still not running at their full capability.

“We are really pushing to reinstate the entirety of NIOSH, because of how interconnected and interdependent all our work is,” Blackwood told Federal News Network, speaking in her capacity as an AFGE member. “It’s really going to be impossible for them to have the same effect without the rest of the support from NIOSH. We were already facing staffing shortages — pre-2019 staffing levels — before all this happened. Funding has been staying level for the last several years. So really, most of the function of NIOSH is gone at this point.”

Even after the partial reinstatements, Micah Niemeier-Walsh, a NIOSH employee and vice president of AFGE Local 3840, said most programs are still unable to fully operate. For instance, some employees were reinstated in NIOSH’s health hazard evaluation program as part of last week’s partial reversal of the RIF. But the chemists who analyze the samples the program receives have not been reinstated. That staffing gap means the evaluation program, similar to many of NIOSH’s programs, cannot complete its work despite appearing on paper to be up-and-running.

“It’s a step in the right direction that some NIOSH employees have been reinstated, but it’s not enough. We cannot actually function and meet our congressionally mandated mission with just 300 employees,” Niemeier-Walsh told Federal News Network at Thursday’s rally outside HHS headquarters.

Story continues below image.

Federal union representatives hold a rally outside HHS headquarters in Washington, D.C., to urge the reinstatement of hundreds of terminated employees at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Micah Niemeier-Walsh, a NIOSH employee and vice president of AFGE Local 3840, speaks to the crowd that gathered for the event. (Photo credit: AFL-CIO)

In the Senate committee hearing on Tuesday, Kennedy promised “to reinstate some of those other jobs” at NIOSH, although he did not provide details on which jobs would be brought back, or which employees would be reinstated.

NIOSH employees said the reinstatements at the agency so far appear inconsistent. Brendan Demich, chief steward for AFGE Local 1916 in Pittsburgh, said research division employees working in NIOSH’s Pittsburgh and Spokane, Washington, offices are still laid off, but employees in the Coal Workers’ Surveillance Program have been brought back to work.

Demich said the staffing cuts undermine Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” agenda, which is focused in part on addressing chronic health conditions.

“Secretary Kennedy, in these hearings, has been identifying chronic diseases and illnesses as being some of the things that they’re trying to target with HHS,” Demich said in an interview. “What we do at NIOSH is we study the things that cause these chronic illnesses and diseases, things that people are exposed to — chemicals in mining. We try to prevent people from ever getting black lung in the first place. We develop technologies and solutions so that they’re not exposed to the coal dust that causes black lung. We’re trying to fulfill that mission.”

Rachel Weiss, an alternate steward for AFGE Local 3840 in Cincinnati, Ohio, added that NIOSH lost all its grants staff and most of its operational staff who support the agency’s long-term planning, including its National Occupational Research Agenda.

“That’s where we work very, very closely with industry and with labor, to make sure that the research we’re doing in the future addresses the needs of workers,” Weiss said. “The future is in question. That’s what we need the entirety of the agency back, because we all work as one giant organism to do what we do.”

The post ‘This isn’t how a RIF is supposed to work:’ HHS reinstates some laid-off employees, gives them extra work first appeared on Federal News Network.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

President Trump Taps Dr. Ben Carson for New Role — A HUGE Win for America First Agenda

Published

on

By

Dr. Ben Carson is the newest member of the Trump administration.

On Wednesday, former Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Ben Carson, was sworn in as the national adviser for nutrition, health, and housing at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins shared that Carson’s role will be to oversee Trump’s new Big Beautiful Bill law, which aims to ensure Americans’ quality of life, from nutrition to stable housing.

After being sworn in, Carson shared, “Today, too many Americans are suffering from the effects of poor nutrition. Through common-sense policymaking, we have an opportunity to give our most vulnerable families the tools they need to flourish.”

Table of Contents

WATCH:

Per USDA:

Today, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins announced that Dr. Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., M.D., was sworn in as the National Advisor for Nutrition, Health, and Housing at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

“There is no one more qualified than Dr. Carson to advise on policies that improve Americans’ everyday quality of life, from nutrition to healthcare quality to ensuring families have access to safe and stable housing,” said Secretary Rollins.

“With six in ten Americans living with at least one chronic disease, and rural communities facing unique challenges with respect to adequate housing, Dr. Carson’s insight and experience is critical. Dr. Carson will be crucial to implementing the rural health investment provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill and advise on America First polices related to nutrition, health, and housing.

“As the U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development in the first Trump Administration, Dr. Carson worked to expand opportunity and strengthen communities, and we are honored to welcome him to the second Trump Administration to help lead our efforts here at USDA to Make America Healthy Again and ensure rural America continues to prosper.”

“Today, too many Americans are suffering from the effects of poor nutrition. Through common-sense policymaking, we have an opportunity to give our most vulnerable families the tools they need to flourish,” said Dr. Ben Carson. “I am honored to work with Secretary Rollins on these important initiatives to help fulfill President Trump’s vision for a healthier, stronger America.”

On Sunday, Dr. Carson was one of the many speakers at the memorial service of the late TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk.

During the memorial service, Carson highlighted that Kirk was shot at 12:24 p.m. and then continued to share the Bible verse John 12:24, which reads, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone: but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit.”

WATCH:

The post President Trump Taps Dr. Ben Carson for New Role — A HUGE Win for America First Agenda appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Politics

LEAKED MEMO: Deep State Prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia Claim There Isn’t Enough Evidence to Convict Comey Amid Reports of Imminent Indictment

Published

on

By

On Wednesday evening, disgruntled officials in the Eastern District of Virginia leaked contents of a memo explaining why charges should not be brought against James Comey.

As reported earlier, former FBI Director James Comey is expected to be indicted in the Eastern District of Virginia in the next few days.

Comey will reportedly be charged for lying to Congress in a 2020 testimony about whether he authorized leaks to the media.

Officials in the Eastern District of Virginia are still fighting to stop Comey from being charged after Trump fired US Attorney Erik Siebert.

President Trump last week fired Erik Siebert as the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia because he refused to bring charges against Letitia James, Comey, Schiff and others.

On Saturday evening, President Trump announced that he had appointed Lindsey Halligan – his personal attorney who defended him against the Mar-a-Lago raid – as US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Now, with just days to go before the statute of limitations runs out to charge Comey for lying during a September 30, 2020 testimony, Lindsey Halligan is reportedly gearing up to indict Comey.

Prosecutors reportedly gave newly sworn-in Halligan a memo defending James Comey and explaining why charges should not brought against the fired FBI Director.

Per MSNBC’s Ken Dilanian:

Two sources familiar with the matter tell me prosecutors in the EDVA US attorney‘s office presented newly sworn US attorney Lindsey Halligan with a memo explaining why charges should not be brought against James Comey, because there isn’t enough evidence to establish probable cause a crime was committed, let alone enough to convince a jury to convict him.

Justice Department guidelines say a case should not be brought unless prosecutors believe it’s more likely than not that they can win a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.

The post LEAKED MEMO: Deep State Prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia Claim There Isn’t Enough Evidence to Convict Comey Amid Reports of Imminent Indictment appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Politics

Nearly 8 in 10 Voters Say the United States is in Political Crisis After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Published

on

By

Nearly eight in ten voters believe that the United States is in a political crisis in the wake of the assassination of conservative icon Charlie Kirk.

According to a Quinnipiac University national poll of registered voters released on Wednesday, a massive 93 percent of Democrats, 84 percent of independents, and 60 percent of Republicans said the nation is in a political crisis.

“The Kirk assassination lays bare raw, bipartisan concerns about where the country is headed,” Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy said of the poll results.

Quinnipiac reports:

Seventy-one percent of voters think politically motivated violence in the United States today is a very serious problem, 22 percent think it is a somewhat serious problem, 3 percent think it is a not so serious problem, and 1 percent think it is not a problem at all.

This is a jump from Quinnipiac University’s June 26 poll when 54 percent thought politically motivated violence in the United States today was a very serious problem, 37 percent thought it was a somewhat serious problem, 6 percent thought it was a not so serious problem, and 2 percent thought it was not a problem at all.

Nearly 6 in 10 voters (58 percent) think it will not be possible to lower the temperature on political rhetoric and speech in the United States, while 34 percent think it will be possible.

Over half, 54 percent, of voters believe the US will see increased political violence over the next few years. Another 27 percent said they think it will stay “about the same,” while just 14 percent believe it will ease.

A 53 percent majority also said they are “pessimistic about freedom of speech being protected in the United States.”

Surprisingly, a 53 percent majority also believes the current system of democracy is not working.

“From a perceived assault on freedom of speech to the fragility of the democracy, a shudder of concern and pessimism rattles a broad swath of the electorate. Nearly 80 percent of registered voters feel they are witnessing a political crisis, seven in ten say political violence is a very serious problem, and a majority say this discord won’t go away anytime soon,” Malloy added.

The vast majority, 82 percent, said the way that people discuss politics is contributing to the violence.

“When asked if political discourse is contributing to violence, a rare meeting of the minds…Republicans, Democrats, and independents in equal numbers say yes, it is,” Malloy said.

The survey was conducted from September 18 to 21 among 1,276 registered voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.3 percentage points.

The post Nearly 8 in 10 Voters Say the United States is in Political Crisis After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Trending