James Comey posted a video after he was indicted by a grand jury in Virginia on Thursday. Comey says he is innocent – just like every other crook in history.

A defiant James Comey lashed out in a video he published Thursday evening after the crooked former FBI Chief was indicted on two criminal charges.

The Department of Justice indicted James Comey on charges of making false statements and obstruction of justice.

To his credit, James Comey refrained from posting another death threat to President Trump following his arrest.

Fired FBI Chief James Comey: My family and I have known for years that there are costs to standing up to Donald Trump, but we couldn’t imagine ourselves living any other way.

We will not live on our knees, and you shouldn’t either. Somebody that I love dearly recently said that fear is the tool of a tyrant, and she’s right, but I’m not afraid, and I hope you’re not either.

I hope instead you are engaged, you are paying attention, and you will vote like your beloved country depends upon it, which it does.

My heart is broken for the Department of Justice, but I have great confidence in the federal judicial system, and I’m innocent. So let’s have a trial and keep the faith.

WATCH COMEY:

BREAKING: James Comey, who once hinted at the assassination of President Trump, speaks after being indicted by grand jury

“I’m not afraid.”

“I’m innocent.”

“Let’s have a trial.” pic.twitter.com/FfoMZXLF8t

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) September 26, 2025

Steve Bannon warned the former FBI Chief, “Comey won’t make it in prison. This is a death sentence.”

The post “I’m Not Afraid” – A Defiant Jim Comey Speaks Out After Indictment, Lashes Out at Trump – Insists He is Innocent Like Every Other Crook in History appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Vicky

James Comey’s son-in-law, Troy Edwards, resigned from the US Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia after Comey was indicted.

Troy Edwards was a prosecutor on the Oath Keepers January 6 trial.

Former FBI Director James Comey was indicted on two counts by a grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia – false statements and obstruction of justice.

“Former FBI Director James Comey has been indicted on two of three counts sought by prosecutors — one count of making false statements and one count of obstruction of justice — just days after President Donald Trump issued a public demand for his Justice Department to act “now” to bring prosecutions against Comey and other political foes, according to sources,” ABC News reported.

Read the indictment here:

Comey indictment / 1
Comey indictment / 2

Troy Edwards resigned in protest.

BREAKING: James Comey’s son-in-law Troy Edwards has resigned from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Virginia after the indictment of former FBI Director. pic.twitter.com/T11juA38Nc

— ALX (@alx) September 25, 2025

The New York Times confirmed Troy Edwards resigned to “uphold his duty to the Constitution and country.”

NEWS: EDVA prosecutor Troy Edwards, James Comey’s son-in-law, resigned after the ex-FBI director was charged over objections of career attorneys.

Edwards, who helped prosecute January 6 rioters, said he left to “uphold his duty to the Constitution and country,” in an email.

— Glenn Thrush (@GlennThrush) September 26, 2025

Reuters also confirmed Troy Edwards resigned.

Troy Edwards, a senior national security prosecutor in EDVA and James Comey’s son in law, has resigned in protest, per an email seen by Reuters

— Sarah N. Lynch (@SarahNLynch) September 25, 2025

The post JUST IN: Comey’s Son-in-Law Resigns From US Attorney’s Office in Eastern District of Virginia appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Vicky

In a landmark case that could reshape American elections for decades, President Trump’s Department of Justice, through Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon and Solicitor General John Sauer, told the U.S. Supreme Court that race-based congressional districts must end once and for all.

The case, State of Louisiana v. Phillip Callais (and the related Press Robinson v. Phillip Callais), stems from Louisiana’s woke lawmakers caving to left-wing judges and creating a second “majority-minority” congressional district.

The brief was unambiguous: the Voting Rights Act (VRA) cannot be twisted into a tool for perpetual racial gerrymandering.

“Today at SCOTUS, the [DOJ Civil Rights Division] told the Justices that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act cannot constitutionally require race-predominant districting!” Dhillon wrote on X.

Today at SCOTUS, the @CivilRights told the Justices that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act cannot constitutionally require race-predominant districting! pic.twitter.com/6uWrzNs9Eq

— AAGHarmeetDhillon (@AAGDhillon) September 25, 2025

Straight from the pages of the DOJ’s filing: “Section 2 does not provide a compelling interest to draw districts where race predominates.”

The brief rips apart the outdated “Gingles framework” from the 1986 Thornburg v. Gingles case, which radical courts have twisted to force states into drawing these race-obsessed districts.

Sauer and company point out that lower courts have been “repeatedly” misinterpreting this to mandate racial gerrymanders, even when there’s ZERO evidence of actual discrimination.

“Lower courts have repeatedly interpreted this Court’s framework… to require States to draw district lines where race predominates over neutral districting principles as a remedy for perceived violations of Section 2’s “results” test,” the brief states.

And get this, they argue this turns the VRA into a tool that “decouple the statute from its function of smoking out voting practices and procedures that are likely intentionally discriminatory and would instead effectively compel racial gerrymanders.  While that likely would have been unconstitutional even when the “results” test was enacted in 1982, its unconstitutionality is even clearer today. Current voting conditions cannot justify such excessive consideration of race.”

Democrats and activist judges have been using Section 2 of the VRA as a weapon to create “phantom statutory violations,” forcing states like Louisiana to violate the Constitution just to appease the race hustlers.

The DOJ calls for a major overhaul: Modify Gingles to align with the actual text of the law and avoid these “fatal constitutional problems.”

Here are the key takedowns:

1. No More Race-First Districts Without Proof: Plaintiffs must prove their proposed majority-minority district is “superior” to the state’s map under race-neutral rules, including political goals. Otherwise, it’s just assuming racism where none exists.
2. Decouple Race from Party: The brief slams how courts let Democrats hide behind “polarized voting” that’s really just partisan divides. “Plaintiffs must decouple party from race when determining whether majority and minority voters vote differently,” it states. No more using black voters’ loyalty to Democrats as an excuse for gerrymandering.
3. Real Evidence of Discrimination Required: Echoing Shelby County v. Holder (which gutted outdated VRA provisions in 2013), the DOJ says current conditions don’t justify this nonsense. Voter turnout is sky-high, minorities are winning elections everywhere – including in Congress, where black representation is at record levels.

You can read the brief below:

The post Trump’s DOJ Goes to War Against Race-Based Voting: Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon and Solicitor General John Sauer Argue Before Supreme Court to ABOLISH Rigged Voting Rights Act Districts appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Vicky