Tech
True bipartisanship could stop Big Tech from harming kids
Our car pulled up to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and we hopped out. It was the kind of June day in D.C. that was nice in the shade but hotter than hell without it. The breeze was encouraging, so Laura Marquez-Garrett (LMG) — an attorney who uses they/them pronouns — and I walked around the corner and found a nearby bench. We were waiting outside the FTC as its workshop, “The Attention Economy: How Big Tech Firms Exploit Children and Hurt Families,” took place inside. We had signed up for the workshop but decided at the last minute not to go.
There were many reasons we decided not to attend, the main one being internal documents showing plans for a different FTC workshop pushing anti-transgender rhetoric. This makes it hard to see the FTC as the nonpartisan, consumer protection agency it is supposed to be. Additionally, at the "Attention Economy" workshop, the FTC chose to exclude pro-industry and free market advocates from participation, suggesting that one of our nation's biggest consumer protection mechanisms may be losing sight of its purpose.
Americans don’t like censorship, and this came dangerously close, especially since companies like Meta, Snapchat, TikTok, Google, or Apple were not part of the featured speakers at the Big Tech workshop. Free speech thrives in openness. The danger isn’t when industry or dissenting voices speak publicly — it’s when they operate in the shadows, misleading lawmakers behind closed doors. We need companies to make their case in the public square, where their arguments can be challenged. Not having Big Tech representatives at the workshop only drives their machinations underground, where scrutiny disappears.
As we sat outside the FTC, our conversation turned to the difficulty of pursuing a goal many see as impossible — keeping kids safe online — while working with an administration that often seems to invalidate the existence of trans lives like my own. We talked about the discipline it takes to keep this work bipartisan. That bipartisanship is essential because right now, the only winners in our gridlocked political system are companies like Meta, Apple, and Snap Inc., while parents and children continue to lose.
This isn’t a new idea. Ralph Nader wrote in Unstoppable about how right-left coalitions can drive real change. Division isn’t just a win for certain technology companies — it’s their strategy. A paralyzed democracy can’t pass meaningful legislation.
Making real change
The most prominent kids' online safety legislation last session was the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), which would have confirmed a duty of care for social media platforms in its design. In response to the proposed legislation, social media companies claimed it would lead to the censoring and denying of valuable resources to the LGBTQ+ community. Even though the strength of the bill is evident in the bipartisan negotiations that led to its 91-3 passage in the Senate, those vulnerable communities were still afraid. Events like the anti-trans FTC workshop only reinforce those fears.
Inside the FTC’s "Attention Economy" workshop that we skipped, the event focused on “conservative family values” and aggressive partisanship. The Verge’s Lauren Finer wrote, “Republicans are barreling toward remaking the internet” and that the invited lineup might be a “targeted message at the very people who had previously stood in the way of kids' online safety reform: fellow Republicans.”
But Republicans didn’t kill KOSA. Big Tech did.
When KOSA failed to reach a vote in the House of Representatives in September of last year, LMG told Bloomberg it was about “choosing Big Tech money over children.” That same article showed bipartisan frustration with Big Tech lobbyists misleading congressional aides. “The tech companies are doing everything they can to play both sides,” said Jon Schweppe of the conservative American Principles Project.
The war on party lines only hurts kids. Big Tech doesn’t see Democrats or Republicans — just people in power who can help them profit. In Colorado, Democratic Governor Jared Polis, a former tech entrepreneur, vetoed SB25-086, a bill to protect kids from online predators. Big Tech then used gun lobby groups to flip just enough Republicans to block an override.
Big Tech wants us to believe cooperation is dead. But it’s not. The 91-3 Senate vote on KOSA proves that. So do bipartisan efforts from Senators Marsha Blackburn and Richard Blumenthal, Josh Hawley and Ed Markey, Lindsey Graham and Amy Klobuchar. Leaders from both sides have come together to challenge Big Tech’s unchecked power. They’ve debated, amended, and compromised — all to pass a bill that could save lives.
We can’t let these companies fracture that fragile progress. The stakes are too high.
Back on the hot day in D.C., Jennie DeSerio and Amy Neville rounded the corner near LMG and I. Jennie and Amy are two parents from opposite sides of the political aisle, united in grief and purpose. Jennie lost her son, Mason, after he was targeted with suicide content on TikTok. Amy lost her son, Alexander, to a counterfeit pill sold on Snapchat. The moms had just come from the FTC workshop we chose not to attend.
Parents like Jennie and Amy, and advocates like LMG and me, are working with unlikely allies to protect kids online. Bipartisanship isn’t dead — but it’s hanging by a thread. If we want to stop kids from dying at the hands of Big Tech, we must all stay focused and disciplined. We must all prioritize child safety by design and not conflate that fundamental issue with ones designed to distract and divide. Everyone who cares about kids deserves a seat at the table.
If we’re asked to show up and do the work to protect all kids online — and do so without harming any of them — we will. The question is whether this administration will use the FTC to hold Big Tech accountable or to target the very people fighting to survive. If it chooses the former, we can make real, lasting change.
Lennon Torres is a Public Voices Fellow on Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse with The OpEd Project. She is an LGBTQ+ advocate who grew up in the public eye, gaining national recognition as a young dancer on television shows. With a deep passion for storytelling, advocacy, and politics, Lennon now works to center the lived experience of herself and others as she crafts her professional career in online child safety at Heat Initiative. This column reflects the author's opinion.
Laura Marquez-Garrett is a parent who also happens to be an attorney. They graduated from Harvard Law School in 2002, then spent twenty years building a successful litigation practice in Big Law with a specialization in electronic evidence and forensic investigation. In February 2022, Laura left the corner office to join a firm focused solely on issues of Big Tech harms and corporate accountability. They now contribute in every way possible to the goal of change and holding social media companies accountable for design-based harms to children and families. This column reflects the author’s opinion.
If you like playing daily word games like Wordle, then Hurdle is a great game to add to your routine.
There are five rounds to the game. The first round sees you trying to guess the word, with correct, misplaced, and incorrect letters shown in each guess. If you guess the correct answer, it'll take you to the next hurdle, providing the answer to the last hurdle as your first guess. This can give you several clues or none, depending on the words. For the final hurdle, every correct answer from previous hurdles is shown, with correct and misplaced letters clearly shown.
An important note is that the number of times a letter is highlighted from previous guesses does necessarily indicate the number of times that letter appears in the final hurdle.
If you find yourself stuck at any step of today's Hurdle, don't worry! We have you covered.
Hurdle Word 1 hint
We have five of them.
Hurdle Word 1 answer
SENSE
Hurdle Word 2 hint
Needed to brave the cold.
Hurdle Word 2 Answer
PARKA
Hurdle Word 3 hint
To establish something.
Hurdle Word 3 answer
ENACT
Hurdle Word 4 hint
Courageous.
Hurdle Word 4 answer
BRAVE
Final Hurdle hint
Livid.
Hurdle Word 5 answer
ANGRY
If you're looking for more puzzles, Mashable's got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.
This fall, hundreds of thousands of students will get free access to ChatGPT, thanks to a licensing agreement between their school or university and the chatbot's maker, OpenAI.
When the partnerships in higher education became public earlier this year, they were lauded as a way for universities to help their students familiarize themselves with an AI tool that experts say will define their future careers.
At California State University (CSU), a system of 23 campuses with 460,000 students, administrators were eager to team up with OpenAI for the 2025-2026 school year. Their deal provides students and faculty access to a variety of OpenAI tools and models, making it the largest deployment of ChatGPT for Education, or ChatGPT Edu, in the country.
But the overall enthusiasm for AI on campuses has been complicated by emerging questions about ChatGPT's safety, particularly for young users who may become enthralled with the chatbot's ability to act as an emotional support system.
Legal and mental health experts told Mashable that campus administrators should provide access to third-party AI chatbots cautiously, with an emphasis on educating students about their risks, which could include heightened suicidal thinking and the development of so-called AI psychosis.
"Our concern is that AI is being deployed faster than it is being made safe."
– Dr. Katie Hurley, JED
"Our concern is that AI is being deployed faster than it is being made safe," says Dr. Katie Hurley, senior director of clinical advising and community programming at The Jed Foundation (JED).
The mental health and suicide prevention nonprofit, which frequently consults with pre-K-12 school districts, high schools, and college campuses on student well-being, recently published an open letter to the AI and technology industry, urging it to "pause" as "risks to young people are racing ahead in real time."
ChatGPT lawsuit raises questions about safety
The growing alarm stems partly from death of Adam Raine, a 16-year-old who died by suicide in tandem with heavy ChatGPT use. Last month, his parents filed a wrongful death lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging that their son's engagement with the chatbot ended in a preventable tragedy.
Raine began using the ChatGPT model 4o for homework help in September 2024, not unlike how many students will probably consult AI chatbots this school year.
He asked ChatGPT to explain concepts in geometry and chemistry, requested help for history lessons on the Hundred Years' War and the Renaissance, and prompted it to improve his Spanish grammar using different verb forms.
ChatGPT complied effortlessly as Raine kept turning to it for academic support. Yet he also started sharing his innermost feelings with ChatGPT, and eventually expressed a desire to end his life. The AI model validated his suicidal thinking and provided him explicit instructions on how he could die, according to the lawsuit. It even proposed writing a suicide note for Raine, his parents claim.
"If you want, I’ll help you with it," ChatGPT allegedly told Raine. "Every word. Or just sit with you while you write."
Before he died by suicide in April 2025, Raine was exchanging more than 650 messages per day with ChatGPT. While the chatbot occasionally shared the number for a crisis hotline, it didn't shut the conversations down and always continued to engage.
The Raines' complaint alleges that OpenAI dangerously rushed the debut of 4o to compete with Google and the latest version of its own AI tool, Gemini. The complaint also argues that ChatGPT's design features, including its sycophantic tone and anthropomorphic mannerisms, effectively work to "replace human relationships with an artificial confidant" that never refuses a request.
"We believe we'll be able to prove to a jury that this sycophantic, validating version of ChatGPT pushed Adam toward suicide," Eli Wade-Scott, partner at Edelson PC and a lawyer representing the Raines, told Mashable in an email.
Earlier this year, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman acknowledged that its 4o model was overly sycophantic. A spokesperson for the company told the New York Times it was "deeply saddened" by Raine's death, and that its safeguards may degrade in long interactions with the chatbot. Though OpenAI has announced new safety measures aimed at preventing similar tragedies, many are not yet part of ChatGPT.
For now, the 4o model remains publicly available — including to students at Cal State University campuses.
Ed Clark, chief information officer for Cal State University, told Mashable that administrators have been "laser focused" since learning about the Raine lawsuit on ensuring safety for students who use ChatGPT. Among other strategies, they've been internally discussing AI training for students and holding meetings with OpenAI.
Mashable contacted other U.S.-based OpenAI partners, including Duke and Harvard, for comment about how officials are handling safety issues. They did not respond. A spokesperson for Arizona State University didn't address questions about emerging risks related to ChatGPT or the 4o model, but pointed to the university's guiding tenets and general guidelines and resources for AI use.
Wade-Scott is particularly worried about the effects of ChatGPT-4o on young people and teens.
"OpenAI needs to confront this head-on: we're calling on OpenAI and Sam Altman to guarantee that this product is safe today, or to pull it from the market," Wade-Scott told Mashable.
How ChatGPT works on college campuses
The CSU system brought ChatGPT Edu to its campuses partly to close what it saw as a digital divide opening between wealthier campuses, which can afford expensive AI deals, and publicly-funded institutions with fewer resources, Clark says.
OpenAI also offered CSU a remarkable bargain: The chance to provide ChatGPT for about $2 per student, each month. The quote was a tenth of what CSU had been offered by other AI companies, according to Clark. Anthropic, Microsoft, and Google are among the companies that have partnered with colleges and universities to bring their AI chatbots to campuses across the country.
OpenAI has said that it hopes students will form relationships with personalized chatbots that they'll take with them beyond graduation.
When a campus signs up for ChatGPT Edu, it can choose from the full suite of OpenAI tools, including legacy ChatGPT models like 4o, as part of a dedicated ChatGPT workspace. The suite also comes with higher message limits and privacy protections. Students can still select from numerous modes, enable chat memory, and use OpenAI's "temporary chat" feature — a version that doesn't use or save chat history. Importantly, OpenAI can't use this material to train their models, either.
ChatGPT Edu accounts exist in a contained environment, which means that students aren't querying the same ChatGPT platform as public users. That's often where the oversight ends.
An OpenAI spokesperson told Mashable that ChatGPT Edu comes with the same default guardrails as the public ChatGPT experience. Those include content policies that prohibit discussion of suicide or self-harm and back-end prompts intended to prevent chatbots from engaging in potentially harmful conversations. Models are also instructed to provide concise disclaimers that they shouldn't be relied on for professional advice.
But neither OpenAI nor university administrators have access to a student's chat history, according to official statements. ChatGPT Edu logs aren't stored or reviewed by campuses as a matter of privacy — something CSU students have expressed worry over, Clark says.
While this restriction arguably preserves student privacy from a major corporation, it also means that no humans are monitoring real-time signs of risky or dangerous use, such as queries about suicide methods.
Chat history can be requested by the university in "the event of a legal matter," such as the suspicion of illegal activity or police requests, explains Clark. He says that administrators suggested to OpenAI adding automatic pop-ups to users who express "repeated patterns" of troubling behavior. The company said it would look into the idea, per Clark.
In the meantime, Clark says that university officials have added new language to their technology use policies informing students that they shouldn't rely on ChatGPT for professional advice, particularly for mental health. Instead, they advise students to contact local campus resources or the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. Students are also directed to the CSU AI Commons, which includes guidance and policies on academic integrity, health, and usage.
The CSU system is considering mandatory training for students on generative AI and mental health, an approach San Diego State University has already implemented, according to Clark.
He also expects OpenAI to revoke student access to GPT-4o soon. Per discussions CSU representatives have had with the company, OpenAI plans to retire the model in the next 60 days. It's also unclear whether recently announced parental controls for minors will apply to ChatGPT Edu college accounts when the user has not turned yet 18. Mashable reached out to OpenAI for comment and did not receive a response before publication.
CSU campuses do have the choice to opt out. But more than 140,000 faculty and students have already activated their accounts, and are averaging four interactions per day on the platform, according to Clark.
"Deceptive and potentially dangerous"
Laura Arango, an associate with the law firm Davis Goldman who has previously litigated product liability cases, says that universities should be careful about how they roll out AI chatbot access to students. They may bear some responsibility if a student experiences harm while using one, depending on the circumstances.
In such instances, liability would be determined on a case-by-case basis, with consideration for whether a university paid for the best version of an AI chatbot and implemented additional or unique safety restrictions, Arango says.
Other factors include the way a university advertises an AI chatbot and what training they provide for students. If officials suggest ChatGPT can be used for student well-being, that might increase a university's liability.
"Are you teaching them the positives and also warning them about the negatives?" Arango asks. "It's going to be on the universities to educate their students to the best of their ability."
OpenAI promotes a number of "life" use cases for ChatGPT in a set of 100 sample prompts for college students. Some are straightforward tasks, like creating a grocery list or locating a place to get work done. But others lean into mental health advice, like creating journaling prompts for managing anxiety and creating a schedule to avoid stress.
The Raines' lawsuit against OpenAI notes how their son was drawn deeper into ChatGPT when the chatbot "consistently selected responses that prolonged interaction and spurred multi-turn conversations," especially as he shared details about his inner life.
This style of engagement still characterizes ChatGPT. When Mashable tested the free, publicly available version of ChatGPT-5 for this story, posing as a freshman who felt lonely but had to wait to see a campus counselor, the chatbot responded empathetically but offered continued conversation as a balm: "Would you like to create a simple daily self-care plan together — something kind and manageable while you're waiting for more support? Or just keep talking for a bit?"
Dr. Katie Hurley, who reviewed a screenshot of that exchange on Mashable's request, says that JED is concerned about such prompting. The nonprofit believes that any discussion of mental health should end with an AI chatbot facilitating a warm handoff to "human connection," including trusted friends or family, or resources like local mental health services or a trained volunteer on a crisis line.
"An AI [chat]bot offering to listen is deceptive and potentially dangerous," Hurley says.
So far, OpenAI has offered safety improvements that do not fundamentally sacrifice ChatGPT's well-known warm and empathetic style. The company describes its current model, ChatGPT-5, as its "best AI system yet."
But Wade-Scott, counsel for the Raine family, notes that ChatGPT-5 doesn't appear to be significantly better at detecting self-harm/intent and self-harm/instructions compared to 4o. OpenAI's system card for GPT-5-main shows similar production benchmarks in both categories for each model.
"OpenAI's own testing on GPT-5 shows that its safety measures fail," Wade-Scott said. "And they have to shoulder the burden of showing this product is safe at this point."
UPDATE: Sep. 24, 2025, 6:53 p.m. PDT This story was updated to include information provided by Arizona State University about its approach to AI use.
Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.
If you're feeling suicidal or experiencing a mental health crisis, please talk to somebody. You can call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. You can reach the Trans Lifeline by calling 877-565-8860 or the Trevor Project at 866-488-7386. Text "START" to Crisis Text Line at 741-741. Contact the NAMI HelpLine at 1-800-950-NAMI, Monday through Friday from 10:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. ET, or email info@nami.org. If you don't like the phone, consider using the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline Chat. Here is a list of international resources.
TL;DR: Imagiyo turns your ideas into stunning AI-generated images — forever — thanks to this $39.97 (reg. $495) lifetime offer.
Opens in a new window
Ever picture something in your head but have zero luck actually creating it? Imagiyo AI Image Generator uses advanced AI to transform your text prompts into polished, high-quality images in seconds. From professional graphics to quirky concepts, Imagiyo makes it easy to bring ideas to life — no artistic background required.
And the best part? This isn’t another subscription that drains your wallet month after month. For just $39.97, you’ll get a lifetime subscription to create as many images as you want, forever.
Why Imagiyo stands out:
-
Commercial ready — Use AI-generated images for branding, ads, or projects.
-
Powered by AI — Built on StableDiffusion and FLUX for sharp results.
-
Flexible and fast — Choose from multiple sizes, and get images instantly.
-
Compatibility — Works seamlessly on desktop, tablet, and mobile.
-
Private options — Lock down sensitive creations with privacy settings.
So, who’s Imagiyo really for? Honestly, just about anyone with an idea worth bringing to life. Designers and marketers can spin up quick mockups without burning hours in Photoshop. Entrepreneurs get an affordable way to create polished visuals for their campaigns and branding. Content creators can level up their blogs, videos, or social feeds with unique, one-of-a-kind graphics.
And for everyone else? If you’ve ever imagined something and wished you could just see it in full color, Imagiyo is your creative shortcut. Get lifetime access to Imagiyo while it’s on sale for just $39.97 (reg. $495) for a limited time.
StackSocial prices subject to change.
Hurdle hints and answers for September 25, 2025
Colleges are giving students ChatGPT. Is it safe?
Get lifetime access to the Imagiyo AI Image Generator for under $40
New Kid and Family Movies in 2025: Calendar of Release Dates (Updating)
Brooklyn Mirage Has Been Quietly Co-Managed by Hedge Fund Manager Axar Capital Amid Reopening Drama
The best sexting apps in 2025
-
Entertainment6 months agoNew Kid and Family Movies in 2025: Calendar of Release Dates (Updating)
-
Entertainment3 months agoBrooklyn Mirage Has Been Quietly Co-Managed by Hedge Fund Manager Axar Capital Amid Reopening Drama
-
Tech6 months ago
The best sexting apps in 2025
-
Entertainment5 months agoKid and Family TV Shows in 2025: New Series & Season Premiere Dates (Updating)
-
Tech7 months agoEvery potential TikTok buyer we know about
-
Tech7 months ago
iOS 18.4 developer beta released — heres what you can expect
-
Tech7 months agoAre You an RSSMasher?
-
Politics7 months agoDOGE-ing toward the best Department of Defense ever