Connect with us

Politics

SBIR/STTR awards remain vulnerable to foreign influence

Published

on

Of the 12 agencies running the Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer programs, only one has made significant progress to prevent or limit foreign adversaries from taking advantage of the research and development funding.

New data from Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), chairwoman of the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee, shows that the National Institutes of Health both flagged and denied all applications that included companies or people from places like China and Russia.

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) is the chairwoman of the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

“The SBIR-STTR programs provide a valuable pipeline of technology that we cannot allow China and other foreign adversaries to steal,” Ernst said in a release. “Most concerning is that a small group of companies receiving the lion’s share of funding are engaging in problematic business and research relationships with Communist Chinese Party agents.”

Ernst’s staff collected data from a dozen agencies in November 2024 asking them for their due diligence data based on a requirement in the 2022 SBIR-STTR Extension Act.

Congress included a provision, authored by Ernst, to require agencies to screen for possible foreign influence in these programs. The provision required agencies to assess the security risks of each small business application.

That data formed the basis for an investigation report, Critical American Technology Vulnerable to China, showing 10 agencies either didn’t flag applications or if they did, the overall number they denied was low relative to the number flagged.

The Homeland Security Department flagged and denied one application. The Energy Department did not respond to the request.

In 2023 and 2024, agencies identified 835 applications for SBIR-STTR funding. Of those, 303 — or 36% — were denied.

Additionally, the investigation looked at continuing concerns about “SBIR mills,” which companies that take advantage of the program to win several awards, but never end up commercializing the technology. Ernst’s staff says six of the largest 25 SBIR/STTR awardees at the Department of Defense have “clear links to countries like China and still received nearly $180 million in DoD awards in 2023 and 2024.”

SBIR mills have long been a concern in Congress. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), former ranking member of the Small Business Committee and now chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, held up the SBIR/STTR reauthorization effort back in 2022 over his concerns.

He said at the time, 21% of the SBIR awards from 2009 to 2019 went to these “mills.” But experts and other data showed Paul’s concerns were overblown.

The new data from Ernst, however, is less about the number of firms winning SBIR/STTR awards and more about who is benefiting from them.

“A review of the 25 companies in DoD’s SBIR/STTR program with the most awards from 2010 to 2023 receiving 7,251 awards amounting to a total of $3.23 billion, all of which are considered a SBIR mill, showed many of these firms had troubling ties with foreign adversaries,” the report stated. “This evaluation revealed that at least 6 out of the top 25 SBIR mills had problematic relationships with foreign adversaries yet continued to receive awards even after implementation of due diligence requirements. In 2023 and 2024, these firms received 297 awards amounting to a total of $178.4 million.”

The data DoD provided to the committee says out of 522 applications flagged for possible risks of foreign adversarial involvement, 152 were denied (29%).

Data from NASA showed the agency flagged 125 applications, but denied just one due to foreign risks. NASA said it denied another 107 for technical reasons rather than concerns over foreign risks.

NIH, on the other hand, flagged and denied all 144 applications where foreign influence was a concern.

Other agencies — including the Department of Agriculture, the National Science Foundation, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) — flagged a small number and denied even fewer.

“Based on 11 congressional briefings that further outlined due diligence implementation, it became evident that there were inconsistencies in how agencies identify foreign ties risks and determine when an application should be denied,” the report stated. “Some agencies seem willing to approve an applicant with significant foreign ties risk when agency officials are determined to fund a certain technological capability, no matter the consequences.”

Ernst’s investigation comes as Congress must reauthorize the SBIR/STTR programs. The 2022 update expires on Sept. 30. Ernst’s Innovate Act would extend the programs another three years to 2028 and continue to press agencies to address concerns over SBIR mills and foreign influence on awards.

The bill would establish a more clear and consistent definition of foreign risk to include a foreign affiliation, technology licensing agreement, joint venture, contractual or financial obligation, investment agreement, research relationship or business relationship. It also would establish a cap of $75 million in SBIR/STTR Phase 1 and 2 awards per company, including subsidiaries.

In addition to Ernst’s bill, Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep Nydia Velazquez (D-N.Y.), the ranking members of the Committees on Small Business, introduced in May the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2025. Their bill would make the programs permanent, extend the due diligence program until 2030, and increase research funding to these firms.

Despite concerns about foreign influence and SBIR mills, experts say the program has been a success story over the last 40 years.

The Public Spend Forum found in a 2023 report that agencies made more than $3.7 billion in awards in 2023 up from approximately $2.8 billion in 2018. Additionally, agencies also expanded their investments in emerging areas like biotechnology and medical technology, and out of 10,000 companies, 40% self-identified as disadvantaged businesses.

The post SBIR/STTR awards remain vulnerable to foreign influence first appeared on Federal News Network.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

DC Leftist Charged with a Felony After Attacking Federal Agent Deployed by President Trump with a Subway Sandwich

Published

on

By

Credit: Wikimedia Commons

One leftist perp will likely be spending some time in prison after pulling one of the dumbest stunts imaginable.

As The New York Post reported, 37-year-old DC resident Sean Charles Dunn was caught on tape using a sandwich from Subway to attack a federal officer deployed by President Trump on the streets of DC Sunday night.

According to the criminal complaint, which was obtained by ABC News, Dunn approached the officer while shouting “f**k you! You f**king fascists! Why are you here? I don’t want you in my city!”

After a few minutes of back-and-forth, Dunn hurls the sandwich, striking the officer square in the chest.

The officers immediately chase after him and eventually take him down.

Below is the link to the video:

https://x.com/rawsalerts/status/1955748342769598601

Police say Dunn admitted his guilt after getting caught, telling an officer, “I did it. I threw the sandwich.”

US Attorney for DC Jeanine Pirro announced on Wednesday that her office has charged Dunn with assault on a police officer, which is a felony.

“He thought it was funny. Well, he doesn’t think it’s funny today because we charged him with a felony: Assault on a police officer,” Pirro stated in a video posted on X.

“And we’re going to back the police to the hilt! So there, stick your Subway sandwich somewhere else!” she added.

The post DC Leftist Charged with a Felony After Attacking Federal Agent Deployed by President Trump with a Subway Sandwich appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Politics

Illinois Judge Denies AG Paxton’s Request to Enforce Arrest Warrants Against AWOL Texas Democrats

Published

on

By

An Illinois judge denied Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s request to enforce arrest warrants against derelict state House Democrats.

The Democrats fled to Illinois last week to block the Republicans from voting on a new congressional redistricting map.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Texas Governor Greg Abbott threatened the derelict Democrats with arrest and removal from office if they didn’t return to the Capitol.

Judge Scott Larson said Paxton failed to “present a legal basis for the court to obtain subject matter jurisdiction over this cause of action…”

The Hill reported:

An Illinois judge on Wednesday declined Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s (R) request to hold Texas Democrats who fled there in contempt.

Paxton reached across state lines to seek a ruling that would effectively force the blue state to comply with efforts to arrest the lawmakers and return them to Texas to end their quorum breaking that has blocked Republicans’ redistricting push.

“As the Petitioner has failed to present a legal basis for the court to obtain subject matter jurisdiction over this cause of action, this court is without jurisdiction to grant petitioner’s emergency motion to rule on pleadings,” Judge Scott Larson wrote in a brief order posted on the case docket.

“This court does not find that it has subject matter jurisdiction, this court does not consider the issues of personal jurisdiction, venue or the merits of the underlying petition for rule to show cause or the request to issue a rule to show cause upon the respondents,” he continued.

Texas Democrats caved and will return to the Capitol for Governor Abbott’s 2nd special session to vote on the GOP’s redistricting effort.

According to ABC News, the Texas Democrats should returning home from Illinois soon.

The Democrats are making all kinds of demands for a second special session from Chicago.

The post Illinois Judge Denies AG Paxton’s Request to Enforce Arrest Warrants Against AWOL Texas Democrats appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Politics

Victor Reacts: Democrat Congresswoman Exposes Her Family on National Television (VIDEO)

Published

on

By

This is just about the dumbest thing you will ever see someone say on national television.

Democrat Congresswoman Delia Ramirez exposed half of her family as illegal aliens.

The Gateway Pundit reported,

Democrat Rep. Delia Ramirez (IL) said she has family members illegally residing in the United States.

This is after she declared ICE a terrorist organization.

“For me, who is the daughter of immigrants who half my family is still undocumented,” Ramirez said on MSNBC.

Earlier this month Delia Ramirez spoke at a summit in Mexico City in which she told the audience that she is “Guatemalan” before she’s an “American.”

“This weekend, I was honored to join progressive legislators from across the continent – our neighbors and friends – for the second Panamerican Congress in Mexico City!” the Democrat lawmaker said.

During her remarks, Rep. Ramirez admitted she has an allegiance to Guatemala.

“I’m a proud Guatemalan before I’m an American,” said Democrat Rep. Delia Ramirez.

These America Last politicians shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near elected office. It doesn’t matter if they are running for dog catcher. Americans deserve better than elected officials who put their own personal interests above those of our country and our people.

The post Victor Reacts: Democrat Congresswoman Exposes Her Family on National Television (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Continue Reading

Trending